There's a little flaw in many of the discussions going on around wikileaks and the erodeing of our democracies.
I agree that opening up the information flows out of governance is a good thing and would improve the situation somewhat.
The flaw is ; None of these "secrets" are actually secrets. One person can have a secret, two people have a conspiracy. All these "secrets" are known by numerous people. Wasn't there something like 2 or 3 million people that had access to some of the leaks? The point is, that it is the nature of the people in the positions of influence that is the core problem. Change the rules? Who cares? We have enough rules if followed to maintain a fairly equitable and free society. It's what's in the hearts of men that determines their behaviour.
At the moment it apears that we are heartsick!! The leaders that abuse their position are supported by a vast network of complicet people. One may not see the whole story but one can smell a bad fish in a large room. And in many ways even those that see and disagree are still somewhat complicet in that we still interact with aspects that we know are tainted.
The bit that really astounds me about the current grab back of power/wealth is its absolute stupidity. It pisses of the proles, their spending power is reduced, the value of fixed assest declines. The pool that they scim is diminished. What? Isn't that counter productive?
Bloody oath!!
If the population is looked after properly they are willing participants in society, they are healthier and more productive, the cost of suppression is released into the pool which is larger anyway, and the scim off would be so much greater at lesser percentages. And everyone feels good. (mostly)
What, are they buiding spaceships or something? Ha Ha?
Choose
Showing posts with label wikileaks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wikileaks. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
The Revolution Dilemma
The big dilemma in political/social activism is; How does one bring about change without coercion? Coercion, by it's nature, steals the individuals freedom. If we seek through activism to improve the lot of our fellows, coercive force is anathema.
To apply compulsion to the population (whether it be economic or military/policing) can be effective. We see all around us the results of this way of managing the population. If done with a light hand, the population will largely be compliant, and their lot will seem preferable to the disruption involved in making changes. Even if those changes are to be to their benefit.
If applied with a heavier hand, there will be growing discontent, especially in the undereducated, as the elite and middle classes see it as their "duty" to coerce them into greater servitude through reductions in economic opportunity, and increasingly restrictive regulation. The better educated, generally the middle management of the system, are generally compliant for they are beneficiaries of the system. There will be, of course, a section of the educated that will use their knowledge and insight to attempt to address some of the failings that they see in the system. This may have some effect.
If applied with a very heavy hand, the undereducated will be ripe for revolution, for they will be to the point where death will seem like a release from the suffering inflicted on them by the elite. Much of the educated will also be ripe for action as they too will be getting shut out of the goodies, as the elite ramp up the accumulation of wealth and power.
This then leads to revolt.
The leaders of the revolution will most probably be from the educated, or even the elite if some of them see a chance to leapfrog the hierarchy to seize power.
Violent revolution is a poor option. Even though the names and faces change, the quality of those new names and faces are generally no better, and sometimes worse, than those they replace. The belief that the population is there to follow the lead of the elite remains. However noble the initial thrust of change is, the method eventually leads to corruption and oppression of varying degrees. And in the process, people die and suffer greatly.
A great hope in the world is that a number of recent revolutions have been non violent(effectively, though there may have been a little).
As we seem to have entered the second stage now in most of the " developed world" (inc China and India) and at stage three in most of the rest, we need to work to not only open up governments and business to scrutiny, we also need to educate and empower those that at present have no strategy to bring about change.
This is where Wikileaks and Julian Assange have entered. They are to be applauded for the quality of insight and the courage that has led them to initiate this strategy for change.
It is imperative that we diffuse the march to violence.
To die for an ideal may be a worthy sacrifice, but to kill for an ideal is lunacy!!!
Choose to be Happy
To apply compulsion to the population (whether it be economic or military/policing) can be effective. We see all around us the results of this way of managing the population. If done with a light hand, the population will largely be compliant, and their lot will seem preferable to the disruption involved in making changes. Even if those changes are to be to their benefit.
If applied with a heavier hand, there will be growing discontent, especially in the undereducated, as the elite and middle classes see it as their "duty" to coerce them into greater servitude through reductions in economic opportunity, and increasingly restrictive regulation. The better educated, generally the middle management of the system, are generally compliant for they are beneficiaries of the system. There will be, of course, a section of the educated that will use their knowledge and insight to attempt to address some of the failings that they see in the system. This may have some effect.
If applied with a very heavy hand, the undereducated will be ripe for revolution, for they will be to the point where death will seem like a release from the suffering inflicted on them by the elite. Much of the educated will also be ripe for action as they too will be getting shut out of the goodies, as the elite ramp up the accumulation of wealth and power.
This then leads to revolt.
The leaders of the revolution will most probably be from the educated, or even the elite if some of them see a chance to leapfrog the hierarchy to seize power.
Violent revolution is a poor option. Even though the names and faces change, the quality of those new names and faces are generally no better, and sometimes worse, than those they replace. The belief that the population is there to follow the lead of the elite remains. However noble the initial thrust of change is, the method eventually leads to corruption and oppression of varying degrees. And in the process, people die and suffer greatly.
A great hope in the world is that a number of recent revolutions have been non violent(effectively, though there may have been a little).
As we seem to have entered the second stage now in most of the " developed world" (inc China and India) and at stage three in most of the rest, we need to work to not only open up governments and business to scrutiny, we also need to educate and empower those that at present have no strategy to bring about change.
This is where Wikileaks and Julian Assange have entered. They are to be applauded for the quality of insight and the courage that has led them to initiate this strategy for change.
It is imperative that we diffuse the march to violence.
To die for an ideal may be a worthy sacrifice, but to kill for an ideal is lunacy!!!
Choose to be Happy
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Julian Assange and Wikileaks
Julian Assange, draped in Wikileaks, strides onto the world stage like a demigod.
Around him the corrupt and fearful scurry like cockroaches bathed in the light of truth and justice.
The population divides.
Those that seek the truth, that value life for the sake of life, that put aside fear for they know that fear leads to death,see the light and are called to it.
Those that are in the thrall of fear, that see death all around, that fear change, that would hold life static, that would advantage themselves over others because they fear poverty and powerlessness, see the light and want to extinguish it.
He is a man who loves his work and uses his considerable talents for the benefit of all. He encourages freedom because he has, for himself, discovered it. He seeks to protect us with the truth from those who would oppress us. He is disinterested in riches for their own sake. He lives a life of overcoming fear.
Let us all emulate Julian Assange.
Let us gather our courage around us and face the fears that eat away at our humanity and cause us to turn our eyes from injustice. Let us stand up and face the forces that would deprive us of our freedom.
Around him the corrupt and fearful scurry like cockroaches bathed in the light of truth and justice.
The population divides.
Those that seek the truth, that value life for the sake of life, that put aside fear for they know that fear leads to death,see the light and are called to it.
Those that are in the thrall of fear, that see death all around, that fear change, that would hold life static, that would advantage themselves over others because they fear poverty and powerlessness, see the light and want to extinguish it.
He is a man who loves his work and uses his considerable talents for the benefit of all. He encourages freedom because he has, for himself, discovered it. He seeks to protect us with the truth from those who would oppress us. He is disinterested in riches for their own sake. He lives a life of overcoming fear.
Let us all emulate Julian Assange.
Let us gather our courage around us and face the fears that eat away at our humanity and cause us to turn our eyes from injustice. Let us stand up and face the forces that would deprive us of our freedom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)